“APARTHEID”-
THE BIGGEST BRITISH LIE EVER ATTRIBUTED TO VERWOERD
"“Apartheid”– that evil term the British press so gleefully attributed
to Hendrik Verwoerd as the “father/architect of “Apartheid” – and that
“system” Jacob Zuma and his “poor disadvantaged” blacks so much blame
whites in South Africa for in fact was a creation and brain child of
these SAME British pestilences to shift the blame of their own evil
creation onto a very innocent ,intelligent man – and an excellent
leader.
Let us explain:
Hendrik French Verwoerd was born in 1893 – got that? He passed away by the hands of the Zionist banking assassins in 1966.
In the year of 1809 the NATIVE PASS LAW of the BRITISH government at the Cape of Good Hope compelled black people to carry a pass book. (Verwoerd was not even born yet.)
In 1865 the British born Sir Theophilis Shepstone PROHIBITED blacks in the province of Natalia to have any voting power.(Verwoerd still was not even born yet)
In 1894 Cecil John Rhodes PREVENTED a colored man- one Krom Hendriks– to join the national cricket tour to England.(Verwoerd was 1 year old.)
In 1905 Rhodes COMPELLED schools in the Cape Province to SEPARATE white British and black people.(Verwoerd was 12 years old)
In 1913 the British NATIVE LAND ACT 2 prohibited black people to own land.(Verwoerd was 20 years old and still a student)
In 1925 British minister HW Sampson promulgated the act on Labor Demarcation to divide whites and blacks.( Verwoerd was 32 and not a politician yet)
In 1927 the Immorality Act was promulgated in British controlled Natal to prohibit intimacy between black and white.(Verwoerd was 34 and still not into politics)
In 1936 SEPARATE representation in parliament was promulgated by none other than liberal British minion Genl. Jan Smuts.( Verwoerd was 43 – an editor of a newspaper and not in politics yet)
In 1945 the Native Urban Area Act prohibited blacks to stay for longer than 72 hours in a white urban area.( Verwoerd only then -at the age of 52- start into politics but had no portfolio to take any decision in parliament yet.)
Lastly the term “Apartheid” was not even used by Verwoerd first- but factually by Dr. DF Malan.
It is quite interesting to take note- that in the year of 1966 when the great man- Hendrik Verwoerd- was murdered- South Africa experienced the healthiest prosperity unknown in South African history. The inflation rate was only 2% and the national growth 7.9%. Verwoerd was deliberately assassinated by the Zionist banking fraternity and the Oppenheimer and Rupert clans to get access to South Africa’s minerals and substantiate a central banking system to control South Africa’s finances and start the first and biggest loan-sharking venture on South African soil- of which Verwoerd was a stern opponent of.
Today more than 80% of all South Africans suffer under debt captivation. Verwoerd’s fears were well substantiated.
“Apartheid”
This strong position was achieved by Dr Verwoerd under a policy of separate development -then dubbed “apartheid. “The living standards ofblacks were rising at 5,4% per year against that of the Whites at 3,9% per year. In 1965 the economic growth rate was the second highest in the world at 7,9%. The rate of inflation was 2% per annum and the prime interest rate 3% per annum. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion.A few months before the assassination, the editor of the British periodical Statist,Paul Bareau, wrote: “At the rate at which South Africa is now expanding the term ‘miracle’ is likely to be appropriate to its development over the next few years”. So, the expectations were that in ‘the next few years South Africa, under a policy of separate development (apartheid), would be in a very strong position against any economic or military threat.
THIS LIBERAL NEWSPAPER SUBSTANTIATE THE FACT THAT THE OPPENHEIMER/RUPERTAND THE LIBERAL CLANS WERE BEHIND VERWOERD’S ASSASSINATION. DE KLERK ALREADY WAS BEGINNING TO GET GROOMED TO HAND OVER SOUTH AFRICA.
His view then was that South Africans will be impoverished by debt if a central banking system ever will be allowed. This is PRECISELY what happened and South Africa currently are so deep in debt with a mere 1.7% growth rate and inflation rate of close to 14% that the scrupulous ANC regime have to make MORE debt from the Zionist loan sharks in order to pay off PREVIOUS debt….the spiral to decay just continuous…JUST as Verwoerd warned. If the poor illiterate South Africans paid more attention to their school classes- and less running around like hooligans in the streets with their “ Liberation before Education” slogans while they burn their schools to ashes- maybe then the likes of thugs like Jacob Zumawould never have entered the political scene and turned South Africa in yet another 3rd world slum.
-AND HERE IS THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH WHY VERWOERD AND AFRIKANER NATIONALISM HAD TO GO…
So- now we have all their British Zionist conspiracies in a nutshell as to WHY Verwoerd HAD to be blamed for “Apartheid.”
UNFORTUNATELY the British press already shifted their evil “Apartheid” creation onto Verwoerd and brain-washed the illiterate black masses ( and the complacent ill-informed international world) for 40 years into believing that it was Verwoerd who was the father of “Apartheid”– and keep their bank-rolled lap dogs in the ANC advocating this evil lie on a permanent basis- just in order to keep the division between black and white so-that the British corporate thugs can proceed to plunder our resources and state coffers.Today- under the British created “Democracy“- reversed “Apartheid” is MUCH worse then “Apartheid” itself ever was- with more than 119 racist laws created against white Afrikaners. Yet ‘n stupefied hippocratic British and local media- as well as the international world- all have deliberate attacks of laryngitis.
THE UNJUST DEMONIZATION OF VERWOERD BY THE BRITISH PRESS- ALL A CONSPIRACY BY THE BRITISH COMMUNIST ELITE TO OUST HIM IN EXCHANGE FOR MONEY RACKETEERING AND CONTROL OVER MINERALS.
OLD BRITISH DISTORTED MEDIA ATTACK ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICIES (pics below)
EVEN THE LOCAL CARTOONISTS TODAY STILL PURSUE THAT AGE OLD DEMONIZATION TACTICS OF VERWOERD.
HERE COMES THE WORST LIE OF ALL: VERWOERD THE “ARCHITECT” OF APARTHEID:
It is ironic that Verwoerd today is branded as a” racist ” when he was the only member of NP government in the 1950s who, as far as I know, is on record explicitly rejecting racist assumptions. In his class notes, as Professor of Sociology at the University of Stellenbosch between 1927 and 1936, he dismissed the idea of biological differences among the ‘big races’, adding that because there were no differences, “this was not really a factor in the development of a higher civilization by the Caucasian race.” He also rejected the notion of different innate abilities. He observed that what appeared to be differences in skills in the case of Europeans and Africans were simply differences in culture due to historical experience.
In the first few weeks of his term as Minister of Native Affairs Verwoerd made an astounding proposal, which historians surprisingly have ignored. It shows that he initially did not intend to limit opportunities for blacks to do advance jobs to the homelands. Verwoerd became Minister for Native Affairs on 19 October 1950, and six weeks later, on 5 December had a meeting took place at his request with the members of the Native Representative Council, which included several leading ANC members. Stating that he expected large numbers of blacks to remain in the big cities for many years, he announced that government planned to give blacks ‘the greatest possible measure of self-government’ in these urban areas. All the work in these townships would have to be done by their own people, enabling blacks to pursue ‘a full life of work and service.’
For this reason, Verwoerd continued, blacks had to be educated to be sufficiently competent in many spheres, the only qualification being that they would have to place their development and their knowledge exclusively at the service of their own people. Verwoerd invited the NRC members to meet him after the session for a ‘comprehensive interview’ about these matters and to put forward proposals, offering a prompt reply from government to their representations.
This was a fateful turning point in South African politics. A new field for black politics could have been opened up if this offer had been accepted,particularly if it set in motion a political process that could have entailed talks between government and the urban black leadership on the election of urban black councils, the formula for the allocation of revenue, the staffing of the local councils’ bureaucracy, property ownership and opportunities for black business. It would have opened up a whole new area for the development of black managerial and administrative capacity, something that country would sorely lack when whites handed over power in 1994.
SO– just WHO was the “architects” and founding fathers of “Apartheid” then?
“Apartheid” was created specifically- and still are kept well and alive by these same despots to ram a “guilty” complex down the white Afrikaner’s throat on a daily basis.
The Afrikaner are psi-opsed to understand he has no rights no more- and deserve nothing-must feel ashamed of his white skin not to be called a “racist“- and must at a constant basis look after the well being of the black because of the ” inequities” of the past- thus for the next 20 years he still must be a submissive slave to the British Jew and black “disadvantaged” parasite that keep on living on state grants supplied by Zuma and his corrupt ilk as long as that black parasite keep on voting the ANC into power with his stomach. It is high time the damn ignorant and stupid South Africans wake up , get their facts straight and start to study more real history and less British and ANC communist propaganda.
Maybe blacks should try reading history books for a change to get more enlightened- and whites stop being such lame-duck bed-wetters and “ humble” pathetic bum nuggets of the devastating media, the “church “ – and the illiterate ever demanding majority."
Let us explain:
Hendrik French Verwoerd was born in 1893 – got that? He passed away by the hands of the Zionist banking assassins in 1966.
In the year of 1809 the NATIVE PASS LAW of the BRITISH government at the Cape of Good Hope compelled black people to carry a pass book. (Verwoerd was not even born yet.)
In 1865 the British born Sir Theophilis Shepstone PROHIBITED blacks in the province of Natalia to have any voting power.(Verwoerd still was not even born yet)
In 1894 Cecil John Rhodes PREVENTED a colored man- one Krom Hendriks– to join the national cricket tour to England.(Verwoerd was 1 year old.)
In 1905 Rhodes COMPELLED schools in the Cape Province to SEPARATE white British and black people.(Verwoerd was 12 years old)
In 1913 the British NATIVE LAND ACT 2 prohibited black people to own land.(Verwoerd was 20 years old and still a student)
In 1925 British minister HW Sampson promulgated the act on Labor Demarcation to divide whites and blacks.( Verwoerd was 32 and not a politician yet)
In 1927 the Immorality Act was promulgated in British controlled Natal to prohibit intimacy between black and white.(Verwoerd was 34 and still not into politics)
In 1936 SEPARATE representation in parliament was promulgated by none other than liberal British minion Genl. Jan Smuts.( Verwoerd was 43 – an editor of a newspaper and not in politics yet)
In 1945 the Native Urban Area Act prohibited blacks to stay for longer than 72 hours in a white urban area.( Verwoerd only then -at the age of 52- start into politics but had no portfolio to take any decision in parliament yet.)
Lastly the term “Apartheid” was not even used by Verwoerd first- but factually by Dr. DF Malan.
It is quite interesting to take note- that in the year of 1966 when the great man- Hendrik Verwoerd- was murdered- South Africa experienced the healthiest prosperity unknown in South African history. The inflation rate was only 2% and the national growth 7.9%. Verwoerd was deliberately assassinated by the Zionist banking fraternity and the Oppenheimer and Rupert clans to get access to South Africa’s minerals and substantiate a central banking system to control South Africa’s finances and start the first and biggest loan-sharking venture on South African soil- of which Verwoerd was a stern opponent of.
Today more than 80% of all South Africans suffer under debt captivation. Verwoerd’s fears were well substantiated.
“Apartheid”
This strong position was achieved by Dr Verwoerd under a policy of separate development -then dubbed “apartheid. “The living standards ofblacks were rising at 5,4% per year against that of the Whites at 3,9% per year. In 1965 the economic growth rate was the second highest in the world at 7,9%. The rate of inflation was 2% per annum and the prime interest rate 3% per annum. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion.A few months before the assassination, the editor of the British periodical Statist,Paul Bareau, wrote: “At the rate at which South Africa is now expanding the term ‘miracle’ is likely to be appropriate to its development over the next few years”. So, the expectations were that in ‘the next few years South Africa, under a policy of separate development (apartheid), would be in a very strong position against any economic or military threat.
THIS LIBERAL NEWSPAPER SUBSTANTIATE THE FACT THAT THE OPPENHEIMER/RUPERTAND THE LIBERAL CLANS WERE BEHIND VERWOERD’S ASSASSINATION. DE KLERK ALREADY WAS BEGINNING TO GET GROOMED TO HAND OVER SOUTH AFRICA.
His view then was that South Africans will be impoverished by debt if a central banking system ever will be allowed. This is PRECISELY what happened and South Africa currently are so deep in debt with a mere 1.7% growth rate and inflation rate of close to 14% that the scrupulous ANC regime have to make MORE debt from the Zionist loan sharks in order to pay off PREVIOUS debt….the spiral to decay just continuous…JUST as Verwoerd warned. If the poor illiterate South Africans paid more attention to their school classes- and less running around like hooligans in the streets with their “ Liberation before Education” slogans while they burn their schools to ashes- maybe then the likes of thugs like Jacob Zumawould never have entered the political scene and turned South Africa in yet another 3rd world slum.
-AND HERE IS THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH WHY VERWOERD AND AFRIKANER NATIONALISM HAD TO GO…
So- now we have all their British Zionist conspiracies in a nutshell as to WHY Verwoerd HAD to be blamed for “Apartheid.”
UNFORTUNATELY the British press already shifted their evil “Apartheid” creation onto Verwoerd and brain-washed the illiterate black masses ( and the complacent ill-informed international world) for 40 years into believing that it was Verwoerd who was the father of “Apartheid”– and keep their bank-rolled lap dogs in the ANC advocating this evil lie on a permanent basis- just in order to keep the division between black and white so-that the British corporate thugs can proceed to plunder our resources and state coffers.Today- under the British created “Democracy“- reversed “Apartheid” is MUCH worse then “Apartheid” itself ever was- with more than 119 racist laws created against white Afrikaners. Yet ‘n stupefied hippocratic British and local media- as well as the international world- all have deliberate attacks of laryngitis.
THE UNJUST DEMONIZATION OF VERWOERD BY THE BRITISH PRESS- ALL A CONSPIRACY BY THE BRITISH COMMUNIST ELITE TO OUST HIM IN EXCHANGE FOR MONEY RACKETEERING AND CONTROL OVER MINERALS.
OLD BRITISH DISTORTED MEDIA ATTACK ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICIES (pics below)
EVEN THE LOCAL CARTOONISTS TODAY STILL PURSUE THAT AGE OLD DEMONIZATION TACTICS OF VERWOERD.
HERE COMES THE WORST LIE OF ALL: VERWOERD THE “ARCHITECT” OF APARTHEID:
It is ironic that Verwoerd today is branded as a” racist ” when he was the only member of NP government in the 1950s who, as far as I know, is on record explicitly rejecting racist assumptions. In his class notes, as Professor of Sociology at the University of Stellenbosch between 1927 and 1936, he dismissed the idea of biological differences among the ‘big races’, adding that because there were no differences, “this was not really a factor in the development of a higher civilization by the Caucasian race.” He also rejected the notion of different innate abilities. He observed that what appeared to be differences in skills in the case of Europeans and Africans were simply differences in culture due to historical experience.
In the first few weeks of his term as Minister of Native Affairs Verwoerd made an astounding proposal, which historians surprisingly have ignored. It shows that he initially did not intend to limit opportunities for blacks to do advance jobs to the homelands. Verwoerd became Minister for Native Affairs on 19 October 1950, and six weeks later, on 5 December had a meeting took place at his request with the members of the Native Representative Council, which included several leading ANC members. Stating that he expected large numbers of blacks to remain in the big cities for many years, he announced that government planned to give blacks ‘the greatest possible measure of self-government’ in these urban areas. All the work in these townships would have to be done by their own people, enabling blacks to pursue ‘a full life of work and service.’
For this reason, Verwoerd continued, blacks had to be educated to be sufficiently competent in many spheres, the only qualification being that they would have to place their development and their knowledge exclusively at the service of their own people. Verwoerd invited the NRC members to meet him after the session for a ‘comprehensive interview’ about these matters and to put forward proposals, offering a prompt reply from government to their representations.
This was a fateful turning point in South African politics. A new field for black politics could have been opened up if this offer had been accepted,particularly if it set in motion a political process that could have entailed talks between government and the urban black leadership on the election of urban black councils, the formula for the allocation of revenue, the staffing of the local councils’ bureaucracy, property ownership and opportunities for black business. It would have opened up a whole new area for the development of black managerial and administrative capacity, something that country would sorely lack when whites handed over power in 1994.
SO– just WHO was the “architects” and founding fathers of “Apartheid” then?
“Apartheid” was created specifically- and still are kept well and alive by these same despots to ram a “guilty” complex down the white Afrikaner’s throat on a daily basis.
The Afrikaner are psi-opsed to understand he has no rights no more- and deserve nothing-must feel ashamed of his white skin not to be called a “racist“- and must at a constant basis look after the well being of the black because of the ” inequities” of the past- thus for the next 20 years he still must be a submissive slave to the British Jew and black “disadvantaged” parasite that keep on living on state grants supplied by Zuma and his corrupt ilk as long as that black parasite keep on voting the ANC into power with his stomach. It is high time the damn ignorant and stupid South Africans wake up , get their facts straight and start to study more real history and less British and ANC communist propaganda.
Maybe blacks should try reading history books for a change to get more enlightened- and whites stop being such lame-duck bed-wetters and “ humble” pathetic bum nuggets of the devastating media, the “church “ – and the illiterate ever demanding majority."
