Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Blaming Verwoerd for what the British did

"“Apartheid”– that evil term the British press so gleefully attributed to Hendrik Verwoerd as the “father/architect of “Apartheid” – and that “system” Jacob Zuma and his “poor disadvantaged” blacks so much blame whites in South Africa for in fact was a creation and brain child of these SAME British pestilences to shift the blame of their own evil creation onto a very innocent ,intelligent man – and an excellent leader.
Let us explain:
Hendrik French Verwoerd was born in 1893 – got that? He passed away by the hands of the Zionist banking assassins in 1966.
In the year of 1809 the NATIVE PASS LAW of the BRITISH government at the Cape of Good Hope compelled black people to carry a pass book. (Verwoerd was not even born yet.)
In 1865 the British born Sir Theophilis Shepstone PROHIBITED blacks in the province of Natalia to have any voting power.(Verwoerd still was not even born yet)
In 1894 Cecil John Rhodes PREVENTED a colored man- one Krom Hendriks– to join the national cricket tour to England.(Verwoerd was 1 year old.)
In 1905 Rhodes COMPELLED schools in the Cape Province to SEPARATE white British and black people.(Verwoerd was 12 years old)
In 1913 the British NATIVE LAND ACT 2 prohibited black people to own land.(Verwoerd was 20 years old and still a student)
In 1925 British minister HW Sampson promulgated the act on Labor Demarcation to divide whites and blacks.( Verwoerd was 32 and not a politician yet)
In 1927 the Immorality Act was promulgated in British controlled Natal to prohibit intimacy between black and white.(Verwoerd was 34 and still not into politics)
In 1936 SEPARATE representation in parliament was promulgated by none other than liberal British minion Genl. Jan Smuts.( Verwoerd was 43 – an editor of a newspaper and not in politics yet)
In 1945 the Native Urban Area Act prohibited blacks to stay for longer than 72 hours in a white urban area.( Verwoerd only then -at the age of 52- start into politics but had no portfolio to take any decision in parliament yet.)
Lastly the term “Apartheid” was not even used by Verwoerd first- but factually by Dr. DF Malan.
It is quite interesting to take note- that in the year of 1966 when the great man- Hendrik Verwoerd- was murdered- South Africa experienced the healthiest prosperity unknown in South African history. The inflation rate was only 2% and the national growth 7.9%. Verwoerd was deliberately assassinated by the Zionist banking fraternity and the Oppenheimer and Rupert clans to get access to South Africa’s minerals and substantiate a central banking system to control South Africa’s finances and start the first and biggest loan-sharking venture on South African soil- of which Verwoerd was a stern opponent of.
Today more than 80% of all South Africans suffer under debt captivation. Verwoerd’s fears were well substantiated.
This strong position was achieved by Dr Verwoerd under a policy of separate development -then dubbed “apartheid. “The living standards ofblacks were rising at 5,4% per year against that of the Whites at 3,9% per year. In 1965 the economic growth rate was the second highest in the world at 7,9%. The rate of inflation was 2% per annum and the prime interest rate 3% per annum. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion.A few months before the assassination, the editor of the British periodical Statist,Paul Bareau, wrote: “At the rate at which South Africa is now expanding the term ‘miracle’ is likely to be appropriate to its development over the next few years”. So, the expectations were that in ‘the next few years South Africa, under a policy of separate development (apartheid), would be in a very strong position against any economic or military threat.
His view then was that South Africans will be impoverished by debt if a central banking system ever will be allowed. This is PRECISELY what happened and South Africa currently are so deep in debt with a mere 1.7% growth rate and inflation rate of close to 14% that the scrupulous ANC regime have to make MORE debt from the Zionist loan sharks in order to pay off PREVIOUS debt….the spiral to decay just continuous…JUST as Verwoerd warned. If the poor illiterate South Africans paid more attention to their school classes- and less running around like hooligans in the streets with their “ Liberation before Education” slogans while they burn their schools to ashes- maybe then the likes of thugs like Jacob Zumawould never have entered the political scene and turned South Africa in yet another 3rd world slum.
So- now we have all their British Zionist conspiracies in a nutshell as to WHY Verwoerd HAD to be blamed for “Apartheid.”

UNFORTUNATELY the British press already shifted their evil “Apartheid” creation onto Verwoerd and brain-washed the illiterate black masses ( and the complacent ill-informed international world) for 40 years into believing that it was Verwoerd who was the father of “Apartheid”– and keep their bank-rolled lap dogs in the ANC advocating this evil lie on a permanent basis- just in order to keep the division between black and white so-that the British corporate thugs can proceed to plunder our resources and state coffers.Today- under the British created “Democracy“- reversed “Apartheid” is MUCH worse then “Apartheid” itself ever was- with more than 119 racist laws created against white Afrikaners. Yet ‘n stupefied hippocratic British and local media- as well as the international world- all have deliberate attacks of laryngitis.
It is ironic that Verwoerd today is branded as a” racist ” when he was the only member of NP government in the 1950s who, as far as I know, is on record explicitly rejecting racist assumptions. In his class notes, as Professor of Sociology at the University of Stellenbosch between 1927 and 1936, he dismissed the idea of biological differences among the ‘big races’, adding that because there were no differences, “this was not really a factor in the development of a higher civilization by the Caucasian race.” He also rejected the notion of different innate abilities. He observed that what appeared to be differences in skills in the case of Europeans and Africans were simply differences in culture due to historical experience.
In the first few weeks of his term as Minister of Native Affairs Verwoerd made an astounding proposal, which historians surprisingly have ignored. It shows that he initially did not intend to limit opportunities for blacks to do advance jobs to the homelands. Verwoerd became Minister for Native Affairs on 19 October 1950, and six weeks later, on 5 December had a meeting took place at his request with the members of the Native Representative Council, which included several leading ANC members. Stating that he expected large numbers of blacks to remain in the big cities for many years, he announced that government planned to give blacks ‘the greatest possible measure of self-government’ in these urban areas. All the work in these townships would have to be done by their own people, enabling blacks to pursue ‘a full life of work and service.’
For this reason, Verwoerd continued, blacks had to be educated to be sufficiently competent in many spheres, the only qualification being that they would have to place their development and their knowledge exclusively at the service of their own people. Verwoerd invited the NRC members to meet him after the session for a ‘comprehensive interview’ about these matters and to put forward proposals, offering a prompt reply from government to their representations.
This was a fateful turning point in South African politics. A new field for black politics could have been opened up if this offer had been accepted,particularly if it set in motion a political process that could have entailed talks between government and the urban black leadership on the election of urban black councils, the formula for the allocation of revenue, the staffing of the local councils’ bureaucracy, property ownership and opportunities for black business. It would have opened up a whole new area for the development of black managerial and administrative capacity, something that country would sorely lack when whites handed over power in 1994.
SO– just WHO was the “architects” and founding fathers of “Apartheid” then?
“Apartheid” was created specifically- and still are kept well and alive by these same despots to ram a “guilty” complex down the white Afrikaner’s throat on a daily basis.
The Afrikaner are psi-opsed to understand he has no rights no more- and deserve nothing-must feel ashamed of his white skin not to be called a “racist“- and must at a constant basis look after the well being of the black because of the ” inequities” of the past- thus for the next 20 years he still must be a submissive slave to the British Jew and black “disadvantaged” parasite that keep on living on state grants supplied by Zuma and his corrupt ilk as long as that black parasite keep on voting the ANC into power with his stomach. It is high time the damn ignorant and stupid South Africans wake up , get their facts straight and start to study more real history and less British and ANC communist propaganda.
Maybe blacks should try reading history books for a change to get more enlightened- and whites stop being such lame-duck bed-wetters and “ humble” pathetic bum nuggets of the devastating media, the “church “ – and the illiterate ever demanding majority."

Monday, February 29, 2016

The Shocking Truth About Racism

Not my words.

How Can We Believe You Mr President

The Shocking Truth About Racism by Juju Mkize a Top Black Academic At the University Of Cape Town
“South Africans are psychologically sick as a result of violence
inflicted upon the majority of the country’s people
during the apartheid era”, President Jacob Zuma
This lie is getting really old!

The history of black South Africans has always been that of violence, death and destruction – NOT inflicted upon them by white people in this country. Shaka Zulu, during his 10-year reign butchered more than 2 million black people in South Africa, not counting the deaths during mass tribal migrations to escape his armies. He had his warriors clubbed to death upon the merest sign of weakness. He neither took a legal wife nor fathered a son, for fear that his heir would plot against him, and had his concubines executed if he discovered they were pregnant. When his mother died, he massacred thousands of his subjects so their families would mourn along with him. Shaka retained his throne through the worst kind of sheer terror, vast mass executions, torture and mindless butchery. His brother, Dingane, was no better. He took power after the assassination of Shaka and started his reign by butchering those loyal to Shaka.That,amongst many other horror stories of black-on-black violence, is the history of Black South Africa.

2014_1$thumbimg130_Jan_2014_150041963-llDuring the Apartheid years it was not better. Factional fighting and tribal conflict was again the main cause of violence and death amongst black South Africans. During the Apartheid era, from 1948 to 1994, the average life expectancy of black South Africans had risen to 64 years, on par with Europe’s average life expectancy. Infant death rates had by been reduced from 174 to 55 infant deaths per thousand, higher than Europe’s, but considerably lower than the rest of the African continent’s. The African population in South Africa increased by 50%.

Deaths due to political violence during apartheid: 21 000 people died in political violence in South Africa during apartheid of whom 14 000 died during the transition process from 1990 to 1994. This includes SA Defence Force actions, for instance the 600 deaths at Kassinga in Angola during the war in 1978. Of those deaths, the vast majority, 92%, have been primarily due to Africans killing Africans, such as the inter-tribal battles for territory. During the period June 1990 to July 1993 a total of 8580 (92%) of the 9 325 violent deaths during the period June 1990 to July 1993 were caused by Africans killing Africans, or as the news media often calls it, “Black on Black” violence – hostel killings, Inkatha Freedom Party versus ANC killings and taxi and turf war violence.

sa_necklaced_burningsThe security forces caused 518 deaths (5.6%) throughout this period. During the transitional period, the primary causes of deaths were not security forces nor white right-wing violence against blacks, but due to “black-on-black necklace murders”, tribal conflict between the ANC-IFP, bombs by the ANC and PAC’s military wings in shopping centers, landmines on farm roads, etc.

In this country TODAY (under black rule) as many as 18 000 people are murdered EVERY year. …and those are the official statistics. More than 400 000 people have been murdered in South Africa under ANC rule.

The past 20 years have been the most violent in the history of this country since the death of Shaka Zulu…and NONE of it has anything to do with WHITE people or APARTHEID… but I guess if you repeat the lie often enough foreigners actually start believing the drivel coming from your mouth, Mr. Uneducated President !!!”

Unfortunately people from all over the world believe the lies you have spread and wrongly blame the Whites for Racism!!

– Email Received at our Email Outpost quoting a letter from  Juju Mkize SRC president of University Cape Town

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Black Nations are Failures and Own Worst Enemies: Jamaican Govt. Official

Black Nations are Failures and Own Worst Enemies: Jamaican Govt. Official

Black nations produce nothing, do not pull their weight globally, even in farming, and lag on all metrics—innovation, hard work, sacrifice, production, prosperity, and then use their own performance deficits to blackmail white people for aid, a senior Jamaican government official has said.
Writing in an opinion column in the Jamaica Observer, Dr Franklin Johnston, who serves as the senior adviser to that island-nation’s minister of education, said that this failure to produce anything of value was one of the prime drivers of racism, because “blacks do not count. Why should they when they can’t prosper one of the dozens of nations they rule?” he asked.

His column, titled “Racism thrives because black nations fail” pointed out that blacks are also highly racist towards all non-blacks of any other race, and employ outrageous double standards in dealing with whites, using the recent police shootings in America of criminal black thugs as an example:
“In Nigeria, blacks just killed 42 blacks and we do not blink, yet we’re rabid when police kill one black youth in the USA,” he wrote.
Dr. Johnston also dismissed the idea that slavery was the origin of racism. “Some say slavery caused racism. But it is dead, and despite multi-hued slaves, only black racism grows.”
He then explained in detail how blacks have racist attitudes towards non-blacks of all hues:
Most ethnic groups are racist to blacks, and we equally so!
Racist Africa expelled Asians (UK took them) as Dom Rep does Haitians today.
Our racists target Indian, Chinese using derogatory names and belittle their success as “yuh see ‘ow all a dem pack up inna on ‘ouse, an a calaloo and rice dem eat an dem av money; mi haffi eat meat!”
He then went on to his main point, that until black nations actually achieve anything of note, they will always automatically be regarded as backward:
The day one black nation has top military, space and nuclear capability, racism goes into immediate remission. Many black nations exist, but none prospers.
That slavery is the root of racism or the cause of black poverty is a cleverly crafted subterfuge by lazy-brained blacks; rip-off reparations and back-to-Africa scams.
Racism against “Gooks” died with Japan’s prosperity; the Chinese blew it away with cash and WMDs.

India (remember we dissed Coolie man?) is gone clear with technology, space and nuclear arms.
Africa is the only major population to be universally disrespected, even here; why?
They have no prosperous, potential menacing nation.
Small Jamaica is up front with big Nigeria as having great potential but mired in ennui, corruption and racism.
Black nations fail and this feeds global racism. We are our worst enemies.
Other races ordered their folks, scientists invented, stole or borrowed technology and got to a point where they could destroy the world—welcome to the head table!
Every black nation is a satrapy. Ours, with the best brand, shames the new world negro; rich, big Nigeria shames itself and black people everywhere!
He concluded by saying that only Africans could end the rest of the world’s view of Africa and black people as backwards:
Blacks can end racism but we will not apply ourselves!
Black nations produce few goods, mainly services—wrong move!
They live off nature’s bounty—tourism, beach, jungle, wild animals; to sing, dance, run, preen on a stage is what we do.
Blacks do not produce basics—sanitary napkin, car, gun, ship, toilet paper—yet use them with impunity.
Blacks do not pull their weight globally, even in farming, and lag on all metrics—innovation, hard work, sacrifice, production, prosperity.
They suffer for their performance deficits and use it to blackmail white people for aid.